Monday, July 20, 2015

This Might Make You Think Twice About Injecting Your Child With Gardasil

Below is a clip from Dr. Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN who helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved, and authored many of the published papers about it. She has been a paid speaker and consultant to Merck. The clip is from a documentary titled “One More Girl,” a documentary that questions the safety of the Gardasil vaccine (Human Papillomavirus [HPV] vaccine that supposedly helps protect against 4 types of HPV), and vaccines in general.

One very important point to acknowledge is the fact that she has appeared in multiple “anti-vaccine” films, and multiple radio shows emphasizing how the HPV vaccines are neither safe nor effective. She has mentioned that the tested length of the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing HPV infection is not long enough to prevent cervical cancer, which, as she states in the video, can take decades to develop. She has also stated that vaccination will not decrease the number of cervical cancer cases, but a routine of regular pap smears will. (source)

There are only about 50 HPV experts in the world, and Dr. Harper is one of them. Again, she has stressed that there is absolutely zero proof that these vaccines work, and that they are safe and effective.
She is clearly against administering these vaccines to young girls, and for good reason.
“It is a vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers are underestimated.” –  (Taken from the One More Girl Documentary) – Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University of British Columbia, in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences.
See what Shaw has to say about aluminum in vaccines HERE.

Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer Merck who has also started to raise his voice against the HPV vaccine, has said:
The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless.  Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all. I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune!  In addition, decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-BarrĂ© syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine. (source)(I’ve had the source translated, I apologize for not being able to find an english translation online) (Here is another video of him speaking in French for those who can understand and/or are able to have it translated by someone)
For another CE article regarding the Gardasil vaccine, please click HERE.
Related CE Article (heavily sourced):

Friday, May 22, 2015

Worst Allergy Season Ever!



Spring might have gotten off to a slow start this year, but that hasn't dampened the effects of pollen. In fact, Dr. Clifford Bassett, founder and medical director at Allergy and Asthma Care of New York told weather.com he predicted "a very robust pollen explosion" this spring -- and he wasn't wrong. 
According to the doctor, there are a number of reasons for the spring sniffles. “One is the rising long term increase in carbon dioxide and its effect on increased production of pollen,” he said. 
“There’s a couple factors,” Dr. Clifford Bassett, founder and medical director at Allergy and Asthma Care of New York, told weather.com. “One is the rising long term increase in carbon dioxide and its effect on increased production of pollen,” another is what he calls “the priming effect," and the last comes down to a battle of the sexes: pollen-producing male trees are dominating greenspace in many cities.

A study concluded that climate warming and the resultant weather effects are "an important factor" in causing the pollen season to be more intense, and this year Dr. Bassett expects the trend to continue. Climate warming and increased carbon dioxide is having a positive effect on pollen production (and thus a negative effect on those suffering from pollen allergens).
“With this carbon dioxide prevalence, we think certain pollens will be more prevalent and more potent, which is a very major factor,” Dr. Bassett said.
Rising temperatures are also to blame. Dr. Bassett explains that hotter summer seasons can result in a stronger pollen season the following spring. “The summer temperature may have an impact on the following spring season as far as grass and tree pollen, which are the representative and most important pollen in the spring.”
To add insult to injury, the wet winter seasons that feature heavy precipitation (like this winter’s record-breaking snow totals) are also having an impact on the pollen season.
“In some studies, a very heavy precipitation during the fall and winter may be enough to enhance the pollen production, particularly in grass pollen,” Dr. Bassett said. “So we may see more grass pollens flowering early and more robustly from a very heavy precipitation in fall and winter, which we’ve seen in many areas. When plants are under stress, they may make more flowers and less leaves and therefore they’ll be more pollen.”

Pollencast: Get the Forecast Near You
Are you reaching for the tissues yet? There is yet another factor contributing to scary pollen forecasts this spring: the priming effect.
As Dr. Bassett describes, the priming effect is when temperatures make big leaps in small periods of time. For instance, when one day the weather is around 30 degrees Fahrenheit and the next the mercury rises to 70 degrees Fahrenheit, the doctor says, “that’s when people really start to suffer.”
The constantly changing and highly varied temperatures cause your body to “[rev] up the immune system and further on down the road, you’re going to be even more hyper-sensitive or hyperactive to the new pollen.” Basically, your body doesn’t take kindly to all of the stop-and-go cues from the weather, which causes increased sensitivity to allergens once they’re released.
Another factor inevitably resulting in more pollen has to do with the types of trees in your environment. When it comes to planning parks and greenspaces, many cities opt for male trees over female trees since they create less mess -- female trees produce seeds that often fall to the ground, making cleaning the sidewalks and grassy areas a pain. Whereas male trees don't, instead they produce pollen. Tom Ogren, who developed OPALS (Ogren Plants Allergy Scale), told NPR that it's better to plant both male and female plants since that will help decrease the amount of pollen in the air.

Monday, March 9, 2015

Hundreds of US farmers sue Syngenta over GMO corn

(NaturalNews) Corn growers in the U.S. lost an upwards of $3 billion in revenue last year after the Chinese boycotted shipments of American corn following the discovery of a genetically modified seed that had not yet been approved in the country.

Agrisure Viptera, a seed genetically altered to contain a protein that kills corn-eating bugs such as earworms and cutworms, had not been approved by China in November 2013 when it was found in several U.S. corn shipments.

China routinely refuses to approve genetically modified seeds before their own testing is complete.
The discovery prompted China to begin rejecting U.S. corn shipments a few months later, resulting in more than 131 million bushels being turned away by one America's most important trade partners.

American farmers took the biggest hit, with the National Grain and Feed Association, a trade group, reporting revenue losses at between $1 billion and $3 billion, according to a report by The Des Moines Register.

American farmers say major Switzerland-based seed company, Syngenta, "gambled" with their livelihood by exporting unapproved GMO seed to China
Manufactured by the Switzerland-based company Syngenta, Agrisure Viptera corn, or MIR 162, was approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 2010. Syngenta sells seeds in more than 90 countries and is the world's largest crop chemicals company, generating a whopping $15 billion a year.

American farmers affected by the rejected shipments say even growers who did not plant the Syngenta seed lost money because China boycotted all U.S. corn and corn byproducts, according to reports.

The enormous financial losses provoked farmers and farm businesses in 20 states to file hundreds of lawsuits against the chemical-maker Syngenta claiming it "gambled" with the livelihood of American growers.

"Knowing that contamination of Viptera corn with the rest of the U.S. corn supply was inevitable, Syngenta nevertheless gambled U.S. farmers' livelihood on approval of Viptera by the major corn-importing countries," according to one lawsuit filed January 13 in the Iowa Southern District Court by Thomas Land and Livestock Corp., a business in the east-central part of the state.

The nature of the Thomas Land and Livestock Corp. lawsuit is property damage and product liability.

Other lawsuits making similar claims have been filed in the corn-growing states of Illinois, Nebraska and Missouri, with hundreds more reportedly being prepared, according to plaintiffs' attorneys.

Agribusiness conglomerates Cargill and ADM file lawsuits against Syngenta citing nearly $100 million in losses


In addition to lawsuits filed by individual farmers, agribusiness conglomerates such as Cargill and ADM, which also export grain, have sued; their businesses too suffered losses. Cargill's estimated losses due to China's boycott are valued at more than $90 million.

A supporter of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the development of related products, Cargill claims Syngenta's sale of MIR 162 before obtaining the proper import approval from major markets was "inconsistent with industry standards and the conduct of other biotechnology companies."

Syngenta said it plans to ask the court to dismiss the farmer lawsuits because "plaintiffs do not and cannot point to any authority barring the introduction of a U.S.-approved product in the U.S. simply because the product was not yet approved for sale in a foreign country like China."

While China eventually approved Syngenta's MIR 162 seed in December 2014, Kansas City lawyer Richard Paul said that doesn't change the assertion that farmers lost money.

"The approval is not the end because markets haven't fully recovered. Obviously that helps, but even though China is now accepting Viptera it has not restored its important levels to pre-ban," said Paul.

"We'll have to see where it goes from here, but it certainly does help put a cap on it, and hopefully at some point here the markets recover."

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048927_GMO_corn_Syngenta_US_farmers.html#ixzz3TvPqmnyo

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Why does Big Food put harmful chemicals in cereal in America but not Europe?

(NaturalNews) The U.S. has a unique system in place for regulating food chemicals. It's been around since 1958, providing loopholes for companies to sneak through. Initially designed to provide oversight, this system has instead become a gateway for welcoming an explosion of food chemicals, all disguised under one name.

In 1958, President Eisenhower signed the Food Additives Amendment. This law gave the FDA power to lump food ingredients under the approval term "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS). Over time, this blanket term has become a loophole for food corporations looking to make their products cheaper.

GRAS system allows food industry to take shortcuts allowing food chemicals voluntary oversight The GRAS system allows food manufacturers to make safety determinations about new chemicals without any real oversight by the FDA. The food industry is allowed to voluntarily inform the FDA about their chemicals, making GRAS a free-for-all for companies trying to get ahead and take shortcuts. These shortcuts put the health of the nation at risk. Since the law's adoption, over 275 new "undisclosed" food chemicals have been deemed GRAS, and there's nothing really stopping this out-of-control spiral. Additionally, the National Resource Defense Council estimates that "there have been 1,000 such undisclosed GRAS determinations."

While other countries ban these chemicals, the American government allows them to infiltrate every aspect of our food. America is literally poisoning itself and its future, suppressing human immune system function throughout the population, making it harder for Americans to overcome disease. These undisclosed food chemicals are often documented for inciting complications like "potentially serious allergic reactions, interactions with common drugs, or [are allowed for] proposed uses much greater than company-established safe doses."

Toxic BHT plagues America's most popular cereals but is taken out of the same cereals sold to Europeans One such horrendous chemical plaguing America's food supply is BHT, or butylated hydroxytoluene. It's "generally recognized as safe," but research has linked this chemical to the formation of tumors, and in some animal studies BHT interferes with hormones. BHT is considered a "caution" ingredient according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI).

The Environmental Working Group has sounded the alarm too, categorizing BHT as one of America's dirty dozen food additives. BHT can be disguised under these synonyms: DBPC, ADVASTAB 401, AGIDOL, AGIDOL 1, ALKOFEN BP, ANTIOXIDANT 29, ANTIOXIDANT 30, ANTIOXIDANT 4, ANTIOXIDANT 4K, ANTIOXIDANT KB and ANTRANCINE 8. Research shows that BHT is toxic, and companies like Kellogg's and General Mills know it. That's why they offer the same cereal products in Europe, but without adding the toxic BHT.

America is one of the only countries still embracing this potentially carcinogenic ingredient. Why are these companies putting American's health at risk while offering safer versions of the same food in other countries? Millions of American children are being exposed to this chemical on a daily basis. Products like Rice Krispies, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Frosted Flakes, Wheaties, Cocoa Krispies, Cookie Crisp, Froot Loops and Corn Pops all contain BHT.

A petition that means business has been launched exclusively at FoodBabe.com. Thousands have already signed, demanding cleaner food from these companies and cereal that doesn't contain toxic BHT. If Kellogg's and General Mills can offer clean versions of their products in Europe, they can do it in America.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048575_BHT_breakfast_cereals_food_additives.html#ixzz3RSARZw8N

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Flu Vaccines Sold by Marketing Fear of Disease: BMJ Report

by Heidi Stevenson Gaia-Health.com

Influenza vaccines are killers, life destroyers, and provide little or no benefit. The evidence is clear. A report published in the BMJ clarifies how these facts are ignored by health agencies. To get around them, they simply push fear of disease well past the point of absurdity. But the CDC and other health agencies have no other way to sell the unsellable. 

The British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the world’s most highly revered scientific medical publications, has published an article that condemns influenza vaccines and their marketing. The last sentence reads:
It’s no wonder so many people feel that "flu shots" don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.[1]

Influenza vaccines don’t work as advertised. Nonetheless, they’re heavily marketed by governmental agencies through one consistent tactic: fear. Dr. Doshi describes how influenza vaccinations are sold:
[I]nfluenza is a serious disease, we are all at risk of complications from influenza, the flu shot is virtually risk free, and vaccination saves lives.

In other words, he’s saying that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which supposedly exists for the benefit of the people’s health, is selling influenza vaccines by trying to scare people into it. It’s pure fear mongering and as we’ll see later, outright lies, to market flu vaccines. He goes on to state that looking through the CDC’s vaccine-marketing lens gives the impression that:
...the lack of influenza vaccine availability for all 315 million US citizens seems to border on the unethical. Yet across the country, mandatory influenza vaccination policies have cropped up, particularly in healthcare facilities, precisely because not everyone wants the vaccination, and compulsion appears the only way to achieve high vaccination rates. 

Dr. Doshi is telling us that a combination of fear mongering and force are now being used to compel people to accept forced drugging by vaccination. Then, he states:
Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. 

The science supporting influenza vaccines is poor. Surely the CDC must know this. After all, it’s their job to know! So, the fact that they use junk science to support a massive program of vaccination clearly demonstrates an utter lack of faith towards the people. There can be no explanation for this dereliction of duty other than having sold out to the manufacturers and the medical system itself.

By the way, those quotes all comes from the first paragraph of Dr. Doshi’s report. Because they’re all provocative statements, it’s imperative that he support them—and that he does, with clarity and force.

Who’s at risk?
When the flu vaccine was originally recommended in the United States in 1960, only adults age 65 or older were considered at risk if they got the flu. Now, the CDC calls for everyone age 6 months or more is considered "at risk". If the CDC is believed, then the entire population is now as weak as only those over 65 were about 50 years ago.

Does the influenza vaccine save lives?
The CDC wants us all to believe that flu vaccines save lives. However, as Dr. Doshi points out, the evidence does not support the claim. The so-called evidence cited by the CDC consistently contains flaws so severe that they should be discounted completely. He points out one study that appears to show a huge improvement in the odds of death from influenza. But, the study was done outside the influenza season, a time that he refers to as, "when it is hard to imagine the vaccine could bring any benefit." Even the authors found the results implausible, stating that their result:
...is simply implausible, and likely the product of the "healthy-user effect". 

Dr. Doshi points out that this same bias is present in many studies. Further, he points out that the CDC itself acknowledges this particular bias in studies. Of course, they buried the admission deep inside a 68 page document:
These studies have been challenged because of concerns that they have not controlled adequately for differences in the propensity for healthier persons to be more likely than less healthy persons to receive vaccination.[2]

This point is only one flaw in the studies cited by the CDC. Also significant is that the CDC completely ignores studies that do not support their chosen vaccination program. They do not admit that the evidence simply does not support their claim that lives are saved.

Is the flu vaccine safe?
The CDC claims that the influenza vaccine is safe. The reality has proven to be the complete opposite. The National Institutes for Health (NIH) actively promoted a video by their director, Anthony S. Fauci, in which he claims:
[T]he track record [of the H1N1 vaccine] for serious adverse events is very good. It’s very, very, very rare that you ever see anything that’s associated with the vaccine that’s a serious event. 

This same swine flu vaccine resulted in these massive adverse effects:
  • It was suspended by Australia in children under 5 years because of febrile convulsions. 1 in 110 children were affected.
  • It caused narcolepsy, a life-devastating neurological illness, in hundreds of adolescents in Europe. 1 in 55,000 adolescents lost their futures to narcolepsy as a direct result of this vaccine.[3]
  • Just recently, the UK has admitted that it caused narcolepsy.[4]

Is this a legitimate review?
With so much junk science being passed off for the purpose of selling products, it’s always a fair question to ask if the authors are legit. In this case, of course, the question is a bit different. Why would this author write this paper?

Dr. Peter Doshi is a post-doctoral fellow at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, which is generally considered to be one of the world’s finest. His career is ahead of him, but this paper may have derailed it. We’ve seen what’s been done to the career of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who was already a world-renowned researcher with impeccable credentials. Dr. Doshi cannot be unaware of that, so the only conclusion to be drawn is that he feels conscience-bound to tell the truth and to inform people of the fact that influenza vaccines are both dangerous and, if not entirely ineffective, certainly they provide only minuscule benefit.

Dr. Doshi has eviscerated both the claims in support of influenza vaccination and the inherent character of our health regulatory agencies. So, will we see any change in the health regulation agencies’ push to vaccinate every human and animal on the face of the earth?

Not a chance. The CDC and virtually all the other so-called health agencies ceased to be protectors of people’s health decades ago, and likely never were. They are nothing but a marketing front for Big Pharma and Big Medicine.

Sources:
[1] Influenza: marketing vaccine by marketing disease; British Medical Journal; Peter Doshi; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3037.

[2] Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010.

[3] Swine Flu Vaccine Caused Narcolepsy in Thousands: BMJ Claim

[4] U.K. gov makes U-turn on link between GSK vaccine and narcolepsy

Monday, October 27, 2014

Congress Says The CDC Can't Be Trusted On Ebola

WASHINGTON -- Members of Congress took the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to task at a hearing on Ebola Friday, hammering the agency over how it has handled the virus's presence in the United States.


The hearing came a day after Craig Spencer, a doctor in New York City, tested positive for Ebola, becoming the first confirmed case in the state. Only three other people have been diagnosed with the disease in the U.S., including Thomas Eric Duncan, who contracted Ebola in Liberia, and two nurses who cared for Duncan after he became ill in this country. Both nurses were declared disease-free this week. The CDC has tightened its guidelines for health care workers treating Ebola patients following criticism that the nurses got infected because the original guidelines were insufficient. No health care workers in the United States have gotten sick since the new guidelines were issued, the CDC notes, and the protocol may soon be strengthened again.


Nevertheless, many members of Congress declared that the government's response to Ebola has been a failure.


Asked outside of Friday's hearing whether the CDC's response has been appropriate, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) told The Huffington Post: "If you believe, as I do, part of the role of the CDC is to provide accurate, timely, complete, thorough information to the public, the answer would be no. Their information hasn't been all that much better than what I could have provided, and I didn't go to medical school for four years."


Earlier this month, CDC Director Tom Frieden said that a travel ban to countries battling Ebola would make the outbreak worse. Medical experts reiterated that point on Friday.
Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Texas) nonetheless told HuffPost that he supports a travel ban for the affected countries, with some exceptions, such as for medical personnel. He said that Spencer "should have been monitored much more closely. I don't think he was careful enough, I don't think I would have ridden the subway." When speaking about the CDC's response, Farenthold remarked, "If you screw up, admit it, take the blame and move forward."


Democrats also had some criticism for the agency. Rep. Gerry Connolly (D- Va.) told HuffPost, "I think they have some real catch-up to do in re-establishing their credibility."
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), addressing Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Nicole Lurie as well as other medical and military experts testifying about the U.S. response, predicted that the experts would be wrong in their recommendations, particularly where travel is concerned.
"I don't think it helps to say 'we've got an aggressive thing on the ground, everything is good.' Because I've got a feeling you’re going to come back and give us a whole different story," said Lynch, who advocated for not only monitoring travelers from West Africa for 21 days after they return, but quarantining them in West Africa for an additional 21 days before they can fly to the United States.


The officials told Lynch that such a plan would be impractical because people can simply take roundabout routes home. They also said that an extensive quarantine would make it much harder to recruit desperately needed health care workers to fight the outbreak at the source.
"It would go against our ability to fight Ebola in West Africa," said Rabih Torbay, a vice president at International Medical Corps, which helps bring doctors into the disease zone.
During the hearing, Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.) fumed at Lurie and argued that the United States had proven to be unprepared for Ebola.


"Are you in charge of being prepared? OK, then I think you need to turn your resignation in," said Mica, waving a report on preparedness at Lurie. The report did not concern Lurie's agency, but rather efforts by the Department of Homeland Security.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) suggested during the hearing that America had lost trust in the scientists and medical officials. "We trust the military more than the CDC on this," he said.
But at least one member said the CDC was doing a great job -- Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), whose district includes the hospital caring for the latest U.S. Ebola patient. She said that she is "proud" of the CDC's response as she's observed it in New York.

Monday, October 6, 2014

Foreigners with risk of Ebola infection are "safe"; Unvaccinated children in the USA "Public Health Threat"??? US Gov. States

(NaturalNews) Right now is the perfect time to point out the gross contradiction in the U.S. government's policies on supposedly preventing the spread of communicable disease. Across the board, children who are unvaccinated against diseases that don't even exist in America anymore - such as polio -- are loudly condemned as "a threat to public health" and often barred from attending public school.




The logic goes like this: An unvaccinated child might easily catch polio and then spread it to other children. Therefore, that child should be barred from attending public school.

But all the logic gets reversed when it comes to ebola and the U.S. southern border. Suddenly, anyone who says the border should be controlled so that ebola-infected illegal immigrants can't enter the United States are called "alarmists" or "racists." Apparently, the idea that an ebola-infected illegal alien might expose others to ebola is now politically incorrect.




Never mind the fact that border agents are catching border crossers who recently came from ebola-infected countries. As reported by Top Right News: [1]



Agents are reporting that they have caught hundreds of illegal aliens crossing our Southern border from African Ebola "hot zones" over the past several months, the majority of them from Liberia... DHS figures indicate that 112 individuals were caught illegally crossing into the United States from Guinea, 231 from Liberia, and another 145 from Sierra Leone, the three Ebola "hot spots". This represents a 95% increase over 2013, before the Ebola crisis heated up.

Ebola is now more common in America than polio

What's even more fascinating about all this is that ebola is now more common in America than polio! There hasn't been a single case of polio since the late 1970's, yet health authorities push polio vaccines with a kind of frantic paranoia that, for some reason, is utterly abandoned the moment we talk about communicable diseases marching into the United States across our open borders.

In summary, the outlandish official position on all this from the U.S. government is as follows:







• Children who are not vaccinated against diseases that don't even exist in American -- such as polio -- should be barred from attending public school, but potential carriers of ebola and other diseases should be welcomed to illegally enter the country regardless of what infectious diseases they carry.







• An illegal alien child with a communicable disease shall be called a "refugee." But an American child with a communicable disease shall be called "a threat to public health."







• U.S. citizens who carry disease should be isolated from others, but non-U.S. citizens who enter the country illegally shall be transported by the government to be deposited on the streets in large U.S. cities across the country.



Just today, Texas Governor Rick Perry called for "fully staffed quarantine stations" at all points where people enter the country. As CNN reports: [2]



Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Monday called for the federal government to enhance screening procedures at points of entry into the United States to check if someone might have Ebola. The procedures would include gathering more information about people coming from affected areas and, perhaps, taking temperatures, he said.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047149_ebola_outbreak_illegal_immigration_public_health.html#ixzz3FOl6ueGd